- DTN Headline News
Ag Chair: No CCC Funds Hold
Thursday, September 19, 2019 2:15PM CDT
By Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor

WASHINGTON (DTN) -- Farmers should not expect any delays in USDA programs such as the trade-aid payments coming from Commodity Credit Corporation funds, the chairman of the House Agriculture Committee told DTN on Wednesday.

"It's taken care of," said Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn.

A political dispute over funding the $30 billion Commodity Credit Corp. (CCC) funds blew up last week after it was reported the House Appropriations Committee short-term funding bill for the government -- a continuing resolution -- would not include an extension of CCC funds, which the Trump administration has used for $28 billion in Market Facilitation Program payments over the past two years.

Peterson said it made no sense to delay the funding to farmers. "So you are going to hold up the money for two months and piss everybody off?" he said.

The CCC fund risks becoming short of cash if Congress doesn't greenlight new fund availability before Oct. 1. The continuing resolution would waive restrictions on the use of the fund until USDA is fully funded under a full fiscal-year appropriations bill. The money still would come, but likely be delayed.

The continuing resolution, much like it was last year, is tied up again because of funding for Puerto Rico -- this time due to a Medicaid situation, Peterson said. So, for now, the only reason the CCC funds would not be available is if the continuing resolution fails to pass and the federal government shuts down as a result, he said.

Senate Democrats on Thursday also threatened to block their version of the spending bill over funding for President Donald Trump's border wall.

Peterson credited Rep. Filemon Vela, D-Texas, chairman of the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, for drafting a letter Peterson and Rep. Jim Costa, D-Calif., chairman of the Subcommittee on Livestock and Foreign Agriculture, signed earlier this week that brought the issue to the attention of leadership.

"Vela was the one who did most of the work," Peterson said.

Several other Democrats on the Agriculture Committee also issued news releases earlier this week calling on leadership to approve the CCC funding.

Republicans made a political issue out of the possible delay in CCC funds, Peterson said.

Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, ranking member of the House Agriculture Committee, issued another statement Wednesday criticizing Democratic leadership over the CCC issue.

Conaway said House Democratic leaders are not listening to their members who have called for funding the USDA programs. He indicated there was no assurance the CCC funds would be in the continuing resolution bill.

Conaway said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and House Appropriations Chairwoman Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., should "stop using our nation's farmers and ranchers and rural communities as pawns in your fight with the president. Fully fund USDA so it can do its job. It is no surprise that China would try to hold our farmers and ranchers hostage so it could continue to cheat on its trade commitments, but we should not expect the leaders of the United States House of Representatives to use rural America as a bargaining chip."

A spokeswoman for another Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee told DTN that Pelosi had assured the congressman that the language renewing the CCC funds would be in the continuing resolution.

At least some Democrats remain opposed to funding the CCC early. The MFP payments were created largely in response to the trade dispute between the U.S. and China that caused China to impose retaliatory tariffs against agricultural products and stopping the sale of U.S. commodities to China.

"There are people in our caucus who don't like this because they think Trump created this problem," Peterson said. "And now he's using government money to buy peace, and he is. We don't agree with this totally, but the farmers need the money."

Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., criticized the CCC at a news conference on farmers and the Green New Deal. DeFazio said he had been in a "maddening" leadership meeting "and how they want to dump $30 billion in that bill for corporate agriculture."

DeFazio said he was listening to a discussion among leadership working on the funding issue and offered his opinion.

"They are still dithering around," DeFazio told DTN. "They have not come to an agreement. I've already expressed very strong concern about this."

"The House members know the CCC has to be replenished as it always has been," Perdue said. "I think while we are perfectly willing to be transparent about how these funds are being used and any kind of information the appropriators need, they don't want to be seen as denying farmers the access to the ARC and PLC payments that are needed this fall, as well as the Market Facilitation Program. We're happy to work with them and give them any information. Nothing is being done behind the curtain. We're willing to be transparent in all of those things."

Congress put limitations on the use of CCC funds under the Obama administration when Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack approved using CCC funds for disaster aid in Southern states, mainly Arkansas, in fall 2010 as then-Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Blanche Lincoln, a Democrat, was in the middle of tough campaign fight she would eventually lose.

Congress then began waiving the limitation on CCC funds once the Trump administration took office, allowing $30 billion available any time of the year without restrictions.

Chris Clayton can be reached at Chris.Clayton@dtn.com

Follow him on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Editorial Staff
Friday, September 20, 2019 11:52AM CDT
Monday, September 16, 2019 10:48AM CDT
Friday, September 13, 2019 10:58AM CDT
Technically Speaking
Editorial Staff
Monday, September 16, 2019 8:40AM CDT
Monday, September 9, 2019 8:34AM CDT
Tuesday, September 3, 2019 8:31AM CDT
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Wednesday, September 18, 2019 10:59AM CDT
Monday, September 16, 2019 1:04PM CDT
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 1:17PM CDT
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Thursday, September 19, 2019 7:50PM CDT
Thursday, September 19, 2019 7:11AM CDT
Tuesday, September 17, 2019 9:24PM CDT
Minding Ag's Business
Katie Behlinger
Farm Business Editor
Friday, September 13, 2019 4:03PM CDT
Wednesday, September 4, 2019 11:26AM CDT
Friday, August 30, 2019 5:22PM CDT
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Friday, September 20, 2019 1:21PM CDT
Thursday, September 19, 2019 1:06PM CDT
Friday, September 13, 2019 7:45AM CDT
DTN Ethanol Blog
Editorial Staff
Friday, September 20, 2019 1:51PM CDT
Monday, September 16, 2019 3:49PM CDT
Friday, September 13, 2019 11:14AM CDT
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Friday, September 20, 2019 6:07PM CDT
Friday, September 6, 2019 2:43PM CDT
Friday, August 16, 2019 3:27PM CDT
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:27AM CDT
Thursday, August 1, 2019 11:33AM CDT
Monday, July 29, 2019 5:10PM CDT
South America Calling
Editorial Staff
Monday, September 9, 2019 10:59AM CDT
Tuesday, September 3, 2019 11:58AM CDT
Wednesday, August 7, 2019 8:34AM CDT
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Tuesday, September 10, 2019 8:52AM CDT
Sunday, September 1, 2019 3:04PM CDT
Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:18PM CDT
Machinery Chatter
Dan Miller
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Friday, September 20, 2019 3:36PM CDT
Tuesday, September 17, 2019 11:26AM CDT
Tuesday, September 10, 2019 3:49PM CDT
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Friday, September 20, 2019 3:58PM CDT
Thursday, September 19, 2019 4:01PM CDT
Wednesday, September 18, 2019 3:24PM CDT
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Tuesday, August 27, 2019 4:36PM CDT
Tuesday, August 6, 2019 12:29PM CDT
Friday, July 19, 2019 5:43PM CDT
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
The ideas expressed and the data from which they are drawn are believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed. Those acting on this information are responsible for their own actions. Please note that there is an inherent risk of loss associatied with trading futures and options contracts even when used for hedging purposes. Futures trading is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
Powered By DTN